View Full Version : Malevolence
Gnaghi
06-07-2005, 11:23 PM
Amazing film not sure if i spelled it right. Anchor bay just released it a few months back if you havnt seen it you dont now what your missing. Its not gory nor is there any nudity which i think gives it a great feel and some credibilty since all todays horror films feel they must flash some tits on screen. If you enjoy 1970's and early 80's slasher films you'll love this. Well worth the $15.00
Gnaghi
06-08-2005, 09:50 PM
What no thoughts on this film. Somebody has had to have seen this.
Yellow Jacket
07-07-2005, 05:10 PM
Haven't seen it yet. But from all of this, I'm sure to rent it soon. No, really, I think I will.
urgeok
07-08-2005, 05:13 AM
Originally posted by Gnaghi
Amazing film not sure if i spelled it right. Anchor bay just released it a few months back if you havnt seen it you dont now what your missing. Its not gory nor is there any nudity which i think gives it a great feel and some credibilty since all todays horror films feel they must flash some tits on screen. If you enjoy 1970's and early 80's slasher films you'll love this. Well worth the $15.00
no tits ?
fuck it, i'm not seeing it.
zwoti
07-08-2005, 10:36 AM
Originally posted by urgeok
no tits ?
fuck it, i'm not seeing it.
thought you were an ass man anyway
TheOmen
07-08-2005, 10:15 PM
It was okay. After a while, the dozen shots ripped right out of Halloween started to tick me off rather than make me think "cool!". I like the movie, but at what point does a homage turn into rip-off? Between Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Halloween, Friday the 13th part2 and John Carpenter's B sides soundtrack, there;s not one thing in this movie that is original.
I loved this film. I felt like it was a tribute to slashers more than anything and i really enjoyed it.
Yellow Jacket
08-03-2005, 11:35 AM
I watched it a week or two ago and thought it sucked! The whole Halloween rip-off score was ticking me off, really bad camera angles, bad acting, and that little girl got on my last fucking nerves! The only thing I liked about it was the credits cuz it meant the movie was over!
No Face
08-05-2005, 12:56 PM
it was ok not bad not good either. it was a knock off and i think it should've been more in depth with why did he owe money why did the kidnapper in the begging kidnap..... kids .who are these people why are they important. it was cool though on the exact opposite reasons on how you didn't know. but thats contradicting myself so yah..... its a 6 out of 10 maybe a 5
jenna26
08-05-2005, 07:53 PM
I thought it was a bit of a bore honestly. I like some of it, I guess. But overall, it felt like pretty much every other slasher flick, and not nearly as well-done as some of them. It lacked some exposition and that hurt it, I think. And that dark haired chick really bugged me. Like in the way that I wanted to kill her my damn self.:D
No Face
08-06-2005, 08:42 AM
don't we all want to kill someone.
MisterSadistro
08-07-2005, 12:39 AM
Its not gory nor is there any nudity which i think gives it a great feel and some credibilty since all todays horror films feel they must flash some tits on screen.
Unfortunately too many films have to rely on this as a selling point. Nice to know that they at least attempted a horror film without either. Unfortunate to hear about the 'Halloween' rip-off score though. THat's been done to death.
CK
AmericanManiac
08-18-2005, 06:15 PM
I bought it when I first heard about it a couple of months ago. I really enjoyed it I didn't think I Would but one scene really creeped me the fuck out was when the one girl was standing in the room with the table, and no one was behind her, then the shot away and back to her and the guy was standing outside the window with the mask scared the shit out of me for some reason.
zomb5150
09-13-2005, 09:28 AM
It wasn't too bad, I don't think I'd buy it.
noctuary
09-18-2005, 09:05 AM
I thought it was a fairly decent movie. Not something I would buy, but I didn't feel like it was a waste of my time either. At least it wasn't another zombie movie.
The_Return
09-18-2005, 09:27 AM
Looks OK, might check it out.
alkytrio666
09-22-2005, 06:29 PM
Just watched it, it's pretty good but I'm not sure if it's all it's cracked up to be. Worth a viewing, though, for sure.
Originally posted by MisterSadistro
Unfortunately too many films have to rely on this as a selling point. Nice to know that they at least attempted a horror film without either. Unfortunate to hear about the 'Halloween' rip-off score though. THat's been done to death.
CK
I had a distributor tell me movies need T&A to sell and then he signed a collection of mine that had no nudity. It had an implied nudity that was apparently convincing enough. The follow up (not really a sequel in the traditional sense, don't want to name the movies and spam while quoting CK) has nudity, but it was so key to the story even my mother approved and she sent me to a Catholic school. My point, flashing tits are nice and all, but they can serve to cheapen a movie if they are thrown in the way chrome wheels are used to sell a car, or a rear spoiler on a front wheel drive 4 banger. (What the hell is that about?)
Wild Zero
10-05-2005, 12:00 PM
Watched it the other day, could not belive how boring it was. It wasn't so much the acting, as it was the villain. It was another one of those many horror films ive fast forwarded through.
(i usually only skip through some of those $1 horror movies you find during the month of october, so that tells you something)
meow
The Mothman
10-25-2005, 05:28 PM
is there any good gore in this?