Log in

View Full Version : the new texas chainsaw massacre (may have spoilers)


crazy clown
11-01-2003, 03:53 PM
i thought that i'd get everybodies perspective on the new TCM movie. i thought that it was good but i thought that they could have sped it a long a little faster. but over all i good movie with a good ammount of gore. my favorite part was when leather face put salt on that uys leg that he had already cut off. ouch

josh
11-01-2003, 03:54 PM
it was ok i thought it would of been better but it seemed like they took bits and peices from ever tcm ever made you know

josh
11-01-2003, 03:58 PM
please pm me back

ChaoticMinister
11-01-2003, 04:05 PM
Upsetting: the ending...

No chainsaw dance by Leatherface... I wanted to see that... instead he clips her car with his saw, then just kinda stands there mad...

Overall: Incredible...

Sadly, I was the only one clapping at the end in the whole theatre...

*FADE OUT*

thehalk
11-02-2003, 05:52 AM
i think its was ok but i didn't like that it was sett up as a documentary
i liked when he put a hook throw that guys back n when his father hit that guy in the mouth with a bottle

Killer Clown#1
11-02-2003, 06:22 AM
Spoiler!!!!

My only beef with the movie is how the hell could Leatherface swing that big ass chainsaw with one hand?!

mictlan
11-02-2003, 06:26 AM
I thought that it was far better than any of the sequels, and did a great job of capturing the mood - heat, dust, isolation, dark and dank, eventually blackest night and sheer horror.

Leatherface was too demonized, IMHO. One of the reasons that the first film was so good was that he was (almost) a sympathetic character. The new TCM had Leatherface as a typical relentless unkillable slasher antihero. I wanted to see him dance too.

If it were to be as good as the first one they would have had to bring Franklin back.

HoRrOrFRK
11-21-2005, 08:21 PM
The new one is awesome it and the original are both great movies the original is way more unbielivavble and the new one is scarier

The_Return
11-22-2005, 02:27 AM
Didnt like the new one at all. The sheriff fella was OK, and the gore was pretty good, but thats about all that it had going for it IMO.

bwind22
11-22-2005, 02:41 AM
Originally posted by The_Return
Didnt like the new one at all. The sheriff fella was OK,

R. Lee Ermey is awesome! That dude is so funny when he's playing the crotchety old asshole (He's sorta been typecast as that, but why not? He's awesome as it.)

All in all, I thought TCM remake was pretty good for a remake that didn't need to be made to begin with. It's right up there with Dawn as one of the better remakes in recent memory but like I said, it wasn't neccesary to begin with.

HoRrOrFRK
11-22-2005, 03:17 AM
I think that people shouldnt compare the old one with the new one and view the new one as a totally different movie

bwind22
11-22-2005, 03:32 AM
Originally posted by HoRrOrFRK
I think that people shouldnt compare the old one with the new one and view the new one as a totally different movie

I think the producer's should just make a totally different movie. How can you remake something and then expect it not to draw comparisons to the original?

Prelude95Si
11-22-2005, 05:34 AM
Liked it, found it to be disturbing for some reason. Out of all the horror movies I've seen this movie is hard for me to watch a second time, I tried, couldn't do it. So when a movie does that to me it must be really good.

1beastieibe
11-23-2005, 07:57 PM
The one thing I dont understand is the baby that she saves in the end.....was it a boy or a girl? they reffer to it as she but it looks like a he. thats all i think about when I watch the movie