View Full Version : What does the MPAA consider "bloody"
Steve_Hutchison
10-02-2004, 03:56 PM
I was wondering. I've seen Freddy's blood switch from red to black, to yellow and perhaps other colors. I think monster blood is more easily accepted by the MPAA than if it was a human's.
What about zombies? I can't remember when the MPAA started it's rating system but why do you think it is that we don't see as many blood in recent zombie movies? They're not humans so it's not really violence, is it?
Radical Edward
10-02-2004, 04:46 PM
maybe its a combo of the 2. like if u look at some war/medieval type movies where they slashin each other with swords, theres hardly any blood. not even on the sword
maybe they weigh violence and gore differently...
GDIS
Sam The Egg
10-02-2004, 05:04 PM
well, if one believes the From Dusk Till Dawn commentary, it's the colour red that they have issue with
Radical Edward
10-02-2004, 05:06 PM
whats that pouring out of kitties ears daddy?
raspberry jelly!
GDIS
Arioch
10-02-2004, 10:03 PM
maybe its a combo of the 2. like if u look at some war/medieval type movies where they slashin each other with swords, theres hardly any blood. not even on the sword
Uh.....you mean Excalibur, Monty Python's Holy Grail, and Braveheart? :confused: :confused: :confused:
Radical Edward
10-02-2004, 11:28 PM
Originally posted by Arioch
Uh.....you mean Excalibur, Monty Python's Holy Grail, and Braveheart? :confused: :confused: :confused:
i mean like more recent ones, troy, dragon heart, many others (cant think of any right now)
too many times hvae i seen them slice into people and hardly any blood on the sword. whereas in most horror movies someone could get just a fuckin pin prick and BAM the set is flooded.
GDIS
Sam The Egg
10-03-2004, 01:23 AM
Originally posted by Radical Edward
too many times hvae i seen them slice into people and hardly any blood on the sword. whereas in most horror movies someone could get just a fuckin pin prick and BAM the set is flooded.
GDIS
dont' forget about Dracula: Dead and Loving It. Only funny part in the whole movie is when that guy from Wings staked that one chick
massacre man
10-03-2004, 04:59 AM
the MPAA considers anything good bloody
meetthecreeper
10-03-2004, 06:56 PM
I think that if the film is rated PG13 that there is violence but you wont see any blood, and I think that the studios want to make films PG13 so they can appeal to a broader audience than an R rated movie, where there is a lot of blood. I dont think a movie has to be bloody or gorey to be good unless it is necessary to the story. I think it is kind of difficult to make a war film, be it WW2, Vietnam, or knights on a battlefield, without the addition of blood. A movie like Braveheart without the blood would not be enjoyable IMO, fighting on a battlefield with a long sword, would def. be a bloody fight.
Fluff the Ho
10-03-2004, 07:00 PM
Originally posted by meetthecreeper
I dont think a movie has to be bloody or gorey to be good unless it is necessary to the story.
exarctly. i view sex in the same way (which is why i cant stand most teen movies, just so pathetic.. appealing to MTV generation)
GDIS
mothermold
10-03-2004, 10:36 PM
..the mpaa got more rules and guidelines than a beach got sand.i recall an article from "gorezone" titled the golden age of gore 1978 to 1984(or 83)highlighting the goodies in that magic window..prior to the mpaa's crackdown.it was'nt blood so much(pooled or splattered)as it was running or flowing...they had an "issue" with that.
Steve_Hutchison
10-04-2004, 02:05 AM
Was the violence in Passion of the Christ really necessary? The MPAA sure thought so.
jay o2 waster
10-04-2004, 04:42 AM
period blood
jay o2 waster
10-04-2004, 04:43 AM
Originally posted by Steve_Hutchison
Was the violence in Passion of the Christ really necessary? The MPAA sure thought so. if it had been any body else up on that cross it would have been rated NC-17
pbenvin
10-04-2004, 04:57 AM
As someone said before, it's the red that they have issue with. Notice how in Kill Bill Vol.1, when that huge fight took place, the movie went from color to black and white. That's so Tarantino could leave all of the violence and bloodshed in without getting an NC-17, or having to edit the shit out of it. After the gore was over, the movie flipped back to color.
Steve_Hutchison
10-04-2004, 05:35 AM
I don't think I'd have a problem with zombies bleeding black in a dark setting.
Arioch
10-04-2004, 06:43 AM
Was the violence in Passion of the Christ really necessary? The MPAA sure thought so
The REAL point of the thread....and the MPAA's true motivation and source of biased ratings emerges.....