#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Thing From Another World (1951)
Quote:
__________________
"Fiction is the truth inside the lie". "Seeing a murder on television... can help work off one's antagonisms. And if you haven't any antagonisms, the commercials will give you some." |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
AHHHHHHHH! I finally run into someone who read "Bored of the Rings" COOL!
__________________
Reality...who needs it! |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
harvard Lampoon - brilliant parody. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Absolutely. I read it during the stone age when it was first released!
__________________
Reality...who needs it! |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Dildo Bugger? :D
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Pick up a paperback book called "Bored of the Rings" is was written somewhere around 1975 or so. Funnier than hell!
__________________
Reality...who needs it! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The first one (1951)is a real classic!
Although the 1983 film is a great remake of the original(1951),I will opt for James Arness' alien, lol! Beve:D I enjoyed all of The LOTR FILMS,BUT THE LAST WAS SUPERB!:cool:
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I'm sort of a late-bloomer in terms of watching old classics, horror and otherwise.
Saw The Thing from Another World just last year. For an old film, it was well-made. Enjoyable. John Carpenter's The Thing may have been better than this, but I'm willing to bet that this old classic can still pull it off over the kind of garbage we get today. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
I think its really apples and oranges with the original and the remake - I love them both but, they are totally different in feel. The original is so slick and funny and confident, where Carpenter's is dark and sombre and pessimistic. Both really captured a different tone.
I read a funny thing from Carpenter about the remake in a book of interviews where JC said he knew he was screwed when ET came out like six months earlier and became such a huge blockbuster. JC claims that the failure of The Thing was what effectively ended his chance of being a major Hollywood director. Sad really. . . . |
|
|