|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#21
02-08-2005, 02:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think Jurassic Park turned out pretty good as fared to the book. Same thing with The Relic.
This is just my opinion, but I don't like ANY movie based off of a Stephen King novel or short story. Not one.
__________________
MISINTUPITATED- The act of removing the spine by use of fire. DEVESTED- The removal of one's vest. SCTUPP- To deficate on a woman after nonconsensual sex. 
|
|
#22
02-08-2005, 02:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Have you seen "Shawshank redemption"???:confused: That movie is bloody awsome!!
__________________
I'm right. It's the rest of the world that's wrong.
|
|
#23
02-08-2005, 02:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Books are books, movies are movies. They're two completely different mediums, why try to compare the two? There are only a couple instances where I would really say "the book was better", and that's only because the book had more to it, and I refuse to count that because books can be a lot longer than movies.
__________________
 ===  WATCH MY MOVIES(UPDATED: 5/7/08, "No Exit") RING OF HONOR: BEST WRESTLING IN THE WORLD  TOO GOOD FOR THE HDC BATTLE ROYALE
|
 |
|
|
