#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
...played by Tim Roth ?
__________________
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hysterical. And it's Steve Buscemi, thanks for the expert and astute input though. EDIT: And actually why was he a 'pedo' as you put it? Because he does no harm, of any kind at all, to the child? I guess that makes most of the population of the World 'pedos' then as most of the people on Earth have also done no harm, of any kind at all, to a child as well. watch the film more closely next time, THEN treat us to your points. Last edited by 42ndStreetFreak; 06-13-2005 at 07:32 AM. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
He wasn't a pedo anyway...he was a serial killer.
The character was meant to have killed over 30 people, wearing somebody's head as a hat. Nothing is mentioned about any offences relating to the underaged, or even pertaining to anything of a sexual nature. So what? He had a tea party with a little girl...the guy was fucking nuts. You DID, however, see that the little girl was left unassaulted. I think Buscemi should play Johnny the homicidal maniac (not that it will ever happen)...he had the right presence... |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
You were supposed to think that the lunatic psycho killer was going to kill the little girl, because he was a lunatic psycho killer, especially when you see him leaving, dazed, with a doll. It was irony, as cheeba said, he was never a pedophile.The irony was that hanging out with a little girl for a while made him decide not to kill again. silly, yes, but hey, it was a bruckheimer movie.
__________________
Some misguided people decided I was funny enough to pay. See if they're right: http://www.cracked.com/members/Vodstok/ (I tweet pretty hardcore, too) |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|