|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#11
05-25-2010, 06:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(I know you weren't saying they didn't deserve it, just wanted to fully make my point).
__________________
 The Ferrets like it... 
|
|
#12
05-25-2010, 07:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah as stupid as it gets, but they are obviously smart enough to stay in the borderland for whats allowed and not. A new racism section perhaps...?
This is from our penal code in Norway : "Penal Code § 135a Anyone who willfully or through gross negligence publicly put forward a discriminatory or hateful speech be punished by fines or imprisonment for up to 3 years. Same with a public utterance made, see § 7, paragraph 2, is considered an expression when it is set up so that it is suitable to reach a larger number of people. As an utterance is considered the use of symbols. Complicity is punishable in the same way. With discriminatory or hateful speech does it mean to threaten or insulting anyone, or promote hatred, persecution or contempt towards anyone because of their: a) skin color, or national or ethnic origin, b) religion or belief, or c) gays orientation, lifestyle or orientation. Added by Act June 5, 1970 No. 1934, as amended by Laws May 8, 1981 No. 14, January 10, 2003 No. 2, 3 June 2005 No 33 (effective January 1, 2006 according to Decree. 17 June 2005 No 608) ." Is this an apropriate law section? Or do you think it comes in the way for the `freedom` of speach? Interested in your opinions guys... If you find some parts in the text making no sense, its probably because i used google translator...
__________________
"Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur"  "The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it."
|
|
#13
05-25-2010, 07:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
stop the world - I want to get off 
|
|
#14
05-25-2010, 07:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Phelps clan is very well-versed in the law and exactly how much they can get away with in terms of demonstrating, but they might've finally gone too far. Not too long ago, the father of a soldier who died and was brought back for his funeral got understandably upset when the Phelps clan showed up to demonstrate (they don't like U.S. soldiers because U.S. soldiers defend a country that defends homosexuality or some crazy reason like that);so he managed to arrange to question their actions in the State Supreme Court. Yes, I understand that groups like the Phelps clan have the right to say how they feel, but spewing hatred at a funeral? Phelps is a sick SOB.
|
|
#15
05-25-2010, 09:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Deportation of the Phelps to Vozrozhdeniya would be a nice solution -
__________________
"Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur" "The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it."
|
|
#16
05-25-2010, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh yeah, it's completely immoral and sick. I watched a programme on them a while back. They're homophobic hate mongers who have no solid arguments for what they preach and are dictated by an idiot.
HOWEVER. They ARE staying within the law. Technically.
__________________
The Ferrets like it...
|
|
#17
05-25-2010, 10:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
05-25-2010, 05:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL ferret, you sure love "rights"
__________________
stop the world - I want to get off
|
|
#19
05-26-2010, 01:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't get it, but I'm pretty sure that was some sort of joke at my expense...
__________________
The Ferrets like it...
|
|
#20
05-26-2010, 04:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
