So who saw "Saw 2"?

[RavageRitual]

I thought this movie was awesome, I thought the first was awesome ass well, Its really hard for me to decide which is better, I love How the "killer" ( i dont know how else to label him ) takes the people and puts them in situations that if they survive they will appreciate life more, and wont be so foolish and let it go by. I just thought it was a great movie and they have great endings.

[meetthecreeper]

Good film.

It would be a mistake to make Saw 3.

[BH14]

Im kinda shock that so many people like Saw 2. Seems like lot of people were kinda mixed on Saw 1 and yet everyone seems to love Saw 2. I cant wait to see it.

[gorefreak]

Originally posted by meetthecreeper
Good film.

It would be a mistake to make Saw 3.

What kills sequels of movies is when they make the same thing over and over. If someone can come up with fresh, new directions for a movie, the sequels can be just as good as the first movie.

[lee challenger]

I must have seen a different film to everyone else.In the history of bad sequels this is right up there among the worst.The only thing that shocked me was how bad this film was.It is very rare I contemplate walking out of the cinema during a movie, in fact the only time it has crossed my mind was Blair Witch 2,but after half hour of Saw 2 I seriously considered it.However I stuck with it and wished I hadn't.
Saw was one of my favourite films of 2004 but this sequel is pathetic.Terrible acting,dumb dialogue,poor soundtrack,ridiculous story,totally unscary and crap direction.

[massacre man]

Saw 3 is already confirmed

[Dee Hart]

I haven't seen it yet, but I have heard it is suppose
to be good. I guess I will have to wait til it comes out on
video.

[BH14]

SPOILER:

This is a movie where the sequel is slightly better than the original. Saw 2 had better plot, better acting, more gore and much better ending. Saw 1 ending was pretty silly. Donnie Walhberg (aka New Kids on the Block) did a fine job. And that big spanish dude was pretty cool. He definitely reminded me of the crazy dude in the movie "Cube". The only problem that I have with this movie is that its trying to impress you with traps and gore rather than build suspense (such as High Tension). Saw 2 could have used to some jump scenes as well just to be more scarier. For example, put a trap that just POPS OUT and makes the crowd jump. However, the movie rocks and I give it a 8.5 out of 10. Better than the original! TDR kinda falls in the same category because its not really suspensful and scary but still great films.

[XFeaRX]

Originally posted by Prelude95Si
I still think the first one was better, I liked the idea of guessing who the killer is even though Jigsaw didn't physicly kill anyone.
But he was responisble for everyones death in Saw 2. He released the nerve agent that would have killed all of them even if Xavier hadn't gone crazy. I still think that because he put the "players" in his game that he killed them even though it was the "players" inability to finish the game that causes their death.

I really liked the very end of the film, I really think that this series could continue.

There was no nerve agent released, damnit cant you follow a simple plot line?

[XFeaRX]

Originally posted by lee challenger
I must have seen a different film to everyone else.In the history of bad sequels this is right up there among the worst.The only thing that shocked me was how bad this film was.It is very rare I contemplate walking out of the cinema during a movie, in fact the only time it has crossed my mind was Blair Witch 2,but after half hour of Saw 2 I seriously considered it.However I stuck with it and wished I hadn't.
Saw was one of my favourite films of 2004 but this sequel is pathetic.Terrible acting,dumb dialogue,poor soundtrack,ridiculous story,totally unscary and crap direction.

awww, poor baby had bad dweems? ;)