abcs of death 2
god, why do they keep producing this wank and why do people seem to like this one more even more than the first. A and B are not bad then it goes downhill rapidly, the one with the zombie courtroom is also pretty good, but it's a case of gems amongst the turds. "2 hour film with pushingtwenty minutes of enjoyment. If this is the future of horror directors i think i'll turn to rom-coms
views |
I have to respectfully disagree. I love this franchise and I think many of these short stories are brilliant. I personally think the second film outshines the first by a great deal, and contained some epic short horror films. It is such a fun horror adventure to have a collection of 26 different directors with completely different concepts and styles of writing, come together to produce an anthology of crazy horror like these. The second film is now on my top ten list of favourite horror films. My personal favourite short being, "S is for Split".
|
I can't believe that there is a 2nd part! i did not like the first movie
|
From a fan of the 1st one (for the most part) - this was complete DREK.
A is for Amateur was good. There were a few ok ones, the rest pointless and not entertaining. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
not so much the budget. Just stupid stories, that try to be 'innovative' or different, and mostly end up crap
|
Ugh, I watched some of the first one, and it was atrocious. Why is there a sequel?
|
Not a fan
To be honest I wasn't a huge fan of this entry in the series. ABC's of Death wasn't really one of my favorites, but the second one I felt was really lacking. I felt like most of them were pretty boring and forgettable, but I feel the same about the first film really (besides D is for Dogfight which was AWESOME!). I watched this film right after watching VHS Viral, which I actually did like.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM. |