Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Horror.com General Forum (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Random Thoughts... (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=40795)

anglewitch 06-06-2015 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bloofer Lady (Post 995788)
Damn this is so true...


Note: everything gets old, nothing on earth stays forever, and not all your deeds shall remain. Yep getting old bites. look at me I have lived and have been killed over the centuries.

Sculpt 06-06-2015 12:10 PM

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...8b9686d408.jpg

"Look what selective breeding did to me! I look like a squirrel!"

horcrux2007 06-06-2015 12:45 PM

Does anyone recommend the Poltergeist sequels?

The Bloofer Lady 06-06-2015 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horcrux2007 (Post 995804)
Does anyone recommend the Poltergeist sequels?

I didn't mind the first sequel..it was alright. Kind of lost its way a few times. Pass on P.3.

Sculpt 06-06-2015 01:31 PM

Sure, if you like the original's basic theme/story. Both sequels are creepy, and decent for Horror films (still P3 was poor for a general film).

They both are not anywhere close as good as the 82 original though (which is a masterpiece). They are more nightmarish, crude (not nasty, rather as in simple), lacking a subtle touch in family relationships and cinematic directing flare.

Both sequels are written and directed by different writers/directors than the original, so you can't expect the same thing.

horcrux2007 06-06-2015 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sculpt (Post 995807)
Sure, if you like the original's basic story. Both sequels are creepy, and decent for Horror films.

They both are not anywhere close as good as the 82 original though (which is a masterpiece). They are more nightmarish, crude (not nasty, rather as in simple), lacking a subtle touch in family relationships and cinematic directing flare.

Both sequels are written and directed by different writers/directors than the original, so you can't expect the same thing.

What do you mean "nightmarish"? I'll give it a watch eventually but jw if anyone really liked them.

Sculpt 06-06-2015 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horcrux2007 (Post 995814)
What do you mean "nightmarish"? I'll give it a watch eventually but jw if anyone really liked them.

They are both less realistic. Poltergeist 82 did a superior job at presenting a very realistic feel of the paranormal experience, along with everything happening making sense and having a reason. The sequels are more storybook, and present things that aren't always related to the plot or 'the paranormal reality', so to speak.

And personally, I didn't like either sequel, naturally compared to the original. The 2nd one had many entertaining aspects, & was definitely it's own story. The 3rd, I recall, as many do, as having annoying aspects. As I recall, spends a lot of time in a nightmarish realm. Fan's of Hellraiser & Elm St sequels might appreciate the style.

tfantasy 06-06-2015 09:43 PM

Feels good to finally be done with the move and unpacking everything......now I hope I have more time for fun ::cool::

Dead Bad Things 06-07-2015 12:20 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Just gettin' back from a goodtime myself...::cool::
Been beatin' the heat down at the family swimmin' hole::smile::

horcrux2007 06-07-2015 03:43 PM

What the fuck was the person who first got milk from a cow doing.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:14 PM.