movies that should have never a sequal

[last bad move]

i was sitting think aboult the movies that could have been way better if the sequal hadent wrecked the original . example...
texas chainsaw # 2and 3 give your opnion

[Sam The Egg]

TCM is still a perfectly good movie. I watched it not too long ago, I couldn't see anywhere where the sequals ruined it.

[Ritualistic]

last you probably dont like the remake...

[Sam The Egg]

was that directed at me or LBM?

[Ritualistic]

it was toward LBM... I do agree with you on this Sam.. 2 and 3 didnt ruin the first one..

[last bad move]

Im not saying that it destroyed the first TCM but the 2/3 just made it seem like the first one was not part of the series and was a differnt movie. like the first leather face was killing everyone but in the sequal he gets the hots for some girl (thats not the leather face I know and love)

[last bad move]

and i do hate the remake its a big joke compaired to the real TCM

[Ritualistic]

To be honest I dont even compare the original with this remake.. IMO it is not even a remake, they are completely different movies. I really like the new one though.. But the original is classic and fucking awesome

[last bad move]

ya i guess your right i think the only reason i hated the remake is because its so different from the first tcm

[Ritualistic]

Originally posted by last bad move
ya i guess your right i think the only reason i hated the remake is because its so different from the first tcm that is why I loved it so much.. I would have be pissed and hated it if they would have tryed to remake the original line by line.. ya know

[last bad move]

you right but you have to amite that the original was the best

[Sick_As_Fuck]

How does any sequel ruin its original? I just can't see how that's possible. Even if the sequel is the worst movie ever made, that doesn't take away from the fact the original is still a great movie. I love the original "Scream", one of my all-time favorite movies, but I didn't really care for the sequels as much. However, that doesn't mean that #1 isn't still a damn good movie in my mind.

[Sam The Egg]

It's like what an author (Stephen King, I think) said once in response to someone asking about the bad movies being made off of his books ruining his work.
"It didn't ruin them, they're still there on the shelf."

[freddy69]

most movies shouldnt have a second part

[avenger00soul]

I don't mind sequels if they still have a story to tell. That's a large factor why T3 was not needed. Cameron himself said that he was finished telling the story.

[Ritualistic]

Originally posted by avenger00soul
I don't mind sequels if they still have a story to tell. That's a large factor why T3 was not needed. Cameron himself said that he was finished telling the story. Shit I like T3 more than T2.... But nothing is better than the first... :-)

[avenger00soul]

Originally posted by Ritualistic
Shit I like T3 more than T2

Wow, you got BIG balls for saying that Ritual.:D

[Ritualistic]

Originally posted by avenger00soul
Wow, you got BIG balls for saying that Ritual.:D Just I never liked T2 when it came out.. and I really wasnt interesting about seeing T3 until I watched it.. It is okay but not great... Like I mentioned nothing like the first one.. oh and thanx yeah I got some big balls LOL :-)

[last bad move]

thats cool its your opinion so im not just bitching but i think t2 is the best then t1after that, t3 i thought just sucked.

[cheebacheeba]

Now, I'm not saying this as though I hated ALL the sequels, but I do get the feeling that A nightmare on Elm st would have had more impact, and acheived even more of a cult status if it were left on it's own...